Re: Which INDY version is usable?

Giganews Newsgroups
Subject: Re: Which INDY version is usable?
Posted by:  arthur hoornweg (arthur.hoornw…@wanadoo.nl.net)
Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2004

Bump?

arthur hoornweg wrote:

> I am implementing an anti-spam filter into our company's
> mail server and I'd like to use INDY for it.
>
> I need the functionality of tidPOP3 and tidMessage so
> that I can load a *.eml mail file, check it for some
> spam characteristics, modify the "subject" line if I
> think there's spam in it, and save the file again.
>
> The basic concept is like this:
>
>  Message:=tidmessage.create;
>  Message.Loadfromfile (filename);
>  If CheckSpam (message) then
>  BEGIN
>      message.Subject:='SPAM! ' + message.subject;
>      message.savetofile (filename);
>  END;
>  message.free;
>
> I had a terrible time using Indy 9.0.14 because some
> basic functionality (tidmessage.savetofile) is
> broken and causes access violations.
> Moreover, the MIME decoder/encoder all by itself changes
> the MIME boundaries in the mail and corrupts some 20 %
> of the e-mail messages it processes, so that Outlook
> Express displays a blank body.
>
> I downloaded the CVS snapshot of Indy 9 only to find that
> the MIME processor was even worse.
>
> So I thought I'd give Indy 10 a try, but my memory monitor
> shows it has memory leaks which makes it unusable.
>
> I'd rather not re-write the whole MIME parsing stuff. Could
> a kind soul give me some advise as to which Indy version is
> the most stable in the POP3 / Mime disciplines?
>
> Or maybe point out an alternative library that works?

--
Arthur Hoornweg
(please remove the ".net" from my e-mail address)

Replies

None

In response to

Which INDY version is usable? posted by arthur hoornweg on Mon, 29 Mar 2004