Re: Malformed address

Giganews Newsgroups
Subject: Re: Malformed address
Posted by:  Remy Lebeau (TeamB) (no.spam@no.spam.com)
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006

"Ciaran Costelloe" <ccostell…@flogas.ie> wrote in message
news:0824EB043CEAE240ccostell…@flogas.ie...

> The last pair of addresses is at fault, they are missing the separating
> ",".  As a minimum, the above example should be added to the source
> code, as an example as to how this unusual exception is triggered.

The exception is question is only triggered when the bAddressInLT flag is
True when the '@' character is encountered.  At no point in the code do I
see the bAddressInLT flag ever being reset back to False after it becomes
True.  That may be the truer cause of the exception being thrown then data
being malformed.

Gambit

Replies

In response to

Malformed address posted by Ciaran Costelloe on Fri, 20 Jan 2006