|Posted by:||Remy Lebeau (TeamB) (firstname.lastname@example.org)|
|Date:||Fri, 21 Jul 2006|
"Tobias Giesen" <tobi…@tgtools.de> wrote in message
> some NAS FTP servers return a 200 rather than 250 after
> a successful rename.
Then they are violating RFC 959, which states that 250 is the only allowed
success response for the RNTO command.
> Any objections to allowing it in TIdFTP.Rename?
Only that it is in direct violation of RFC 959, and that the NAS servers
should be updated to follow standards properly.
TIdFTP.Rename posted by Tobias Giesen on Fri, 21 Jul 2006